The Killing of Henry Nowak - No Justice, No Peace!

Voting and Protest Marches Will Not Put Any of This Right

The belated headlines on the vicious racist murder of Henry Nowak, and the utterly despicable behaviour of the police, are providing yet another bonanza for all the commentators with massive and monetised reaches on the big social media platforms.

The counter-jihad provocateurs are somewhat handicapped, since neither the killer nor the police who handcuffed the dying boy were Muslims. But the harder right’s grifters are coining it, breathlessly repeating every grim detail of the murder by a Sikh and his family, and the all too predictable response of the institutionally anti-white racist cops.

Outrage brings hits, and hits boost revenue.

Now, of course, the case needs highlighting. And anyone who doesn’t feel outrage is either inwardly dead, a coward or a traitor – to humanity as well as to our people. The more so because, as we all know, this was not some isolated one-off. It is merely an unusually visible tip of one of the gigantic icebergs of anti-white racism which besmirch every nation in the so-called ‘civilised’ West.

But I’m really sick of these people, and especially of their calls for the public to do something about the slaughter of Henry Nowak by getting behind Restore, or Reform, or a micro-party with a manifesto and no prospect of ever implementing a single comma of it.

I’m sick of them, and their lies that this can all be put right, that such injustices to our people will be ended, by voting for a different set of libertarian, Randian, individualistic, free market capitalists who see the legitimate grievances of the ‘Forgotten People’ as a source of votes. I’ m sick too of the self-proclaimed ‘ethno-nationalists’ who speak instead of peaceful protests and banner drops.

Because none of those will change anything. The slogan the ones with particular pretensions towards militancy use is “No Justice, No Peace”. It’s a very good phrase, as it happens, but not because it carries any weight in itself. It has long been used by assorted minorities, including the other year by the supporters of the career criminal George Floyd.

It works for them not because it is a well-crafted slogan, but because it is a threat. A threat which they are prepared to turn into a very real lack of peace - in response to genuine, perceived and pretend injustice – at the drop of a hat.

That is a key reason why the ‘racism’ and prejudice towards their communities which did exist in various degrees, for both genuine and bad reasons, has been systematically decommissioned. The police, courts and other Powers That Be have drastically changed their attitude to those communities over the last few decades.

This is partly the result of the left’s Long March through such institutions, which has seen an ideological drive against racism when directed at non-whites, and actively encouraged various forms of racism against the indigenous majority.

Far more important, however, were the black riots which began in Bristol in 1980, and were repeated in several waves of ultra-violence that decade and since, in Brixton, North London, Birmingham, Leeds, Toxteth and so on. Followed by Muslim riots in 2001, and beyond. The total cost of these ran into hundreds of millions.

It took some time for the message to sink in, but the repeated riots did the trick, concentrating the minds of the right of the political and media class on the idea that surrendering to the demands of intellectual agitators such as McPherson was the way to keep things calm.

“No Justice, No Peace” worked. “Justice – Or We’ll Hold a Peaceful Protest” never will. Partly because, as I’ve already reminded you, a very significant part of ‘our’ ruling elite actually hates and despises us. And partly because, in granting the indigenous rights, they would risk being seen to diminish the special status that militant minorities have managed to prise out of the body politic.

The elite’s innate bias against our people means that our impolite and militant response to injustice will necessarily take longer, and demand more effort and impoliteness, than was required to get the minorities heard and taken notice of. The sooner we start, the better, because it’s going to take a long time.

I am not suggesting that indigenous Brits should immediately respond to what happened to Henry Nowak by rioting, not least because burning down your own areas is really not the most intelligent way to apply pressure to the Powers That Be.

Further, while there is a moral right (indeed, a duty) to oppose injustice and evil by force, it does not come into being until all other possible methods have been tried, and rejected by those who have the power to rectify matters.

We already know that peaceful protests will be ignored, not least because nationalists have been making them for even longer than the fifty plus years in which I’ve served. All but the very stupid already know that standing and voting in elections will not make any difference. If nothing else, the readiness with which ‘liberal’ parties elsewhere in Europe have simply banned parties which threatened their electoral cartel, should disabuse anyone of the potential of the ‘parliamentary road’.

But Non-Violent Direct Action (NVDA) has not been used to campaign for justice for and the rights of the indigenous peoples of our lands. In relatively recent times, the NVDA campaigns run by Welsh language activists during the 1960s provide a particularly good example of the tactics and their power.

Out of fewer than one million Welsh-speakers, thousands were arrested and prosecuted for non-violent but militant protests for equal status for their ‘second-class’ language. Many went to prison, but they enjoyed the backing of their entire community and, in the end, they won the legal recognition for which they fought.

Tried and tested tactics such as occupations, sit-ins, paint daubings, tax strikes and the like can readily be studied, from the actions of the Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg in Wales through to Gandhi’s mass protests against British rule in India. The Civil Rights campaign in the USA will also bear careful study.

New technologies are sure to repay inventive consideration as well. Future Non-Violent Direct Action is bound to include the use of hacking and drones. The more complex and technologically advanced a society, the more it is susceptible to such disruption.

Lawfare is another vital field, and one which must be used to the full before anyone starts hacking things or flying drones into places they don’t properly belong. As I wrote some months ago in relation to leftist councils’ removal of patriotic flags, there will certainly be an important role for the mass use of various complaints mechanisms, Freedom of Information Requests and pre-action letters for Judicial Review.

The ‘movement’ also needs to develop the capability to bring serious legal challenges to specific injustices, especially those which breach the liberals’ own Equality legislation. We have to learn to use their language, thought processes and laws, to help to secure rights for our people which every other section of our increasingly Balkanised society takes for granted.

We also need to banish two particularly pernicious superstitions: First, that this can be stopped by voting, even for people who condemn it. Second, that the police are anything other than the mercenary enforcers of a fundamentally and irredeemably anti-white System.

It is important to be clear that a campaign for the rights of the indigenous peoples of Britain (and the wider world of European-founded nations) is not a campaign to remove rights from anyone else. As the BNP campaign in East London ran even before I joined the party, this is about “Equal Rights for Whites”. Or, as our campaign in the late noughties against anti-white racist murders put it “Racism Cuts Both Ways”.

Provided our demands are thoughtfully worded, many non-whites are perfectly capable of understanding that such injustices, upheld by the ruling elite, are not only unfair to us, but also potentially dangerous to them if people blame them for being put on a pedestal by our collective masters.

As an example of this, whenever I have told non-whites that it is illegal to set up a charity for the English, they have reacted first with disbelief, and then by condemning the situation. This includes the Muslims who the counter-jihadists say are the beginning and end of our problems.

It is only the ruling elite who seem unaware that this perpetual inequality, punctuated only by outrages such as the treatment of Henry Nowak, is steadily building in our people a bitter rage. If left to fester, this will lead to the same sort of violent outbursts which we saw in past decades among the now advantaged ‘minorities’. Potentially, these could target innocent minorities instead of the guilty elite.

If they do not listen to reason now, or to the non-violent direct action protests of the future, then they will be the ones to blame for the violence which the resulting frustration and anger will produce.

Not, be it noted, the only ones. Because the guilt will also be shared by those who – right now – are monetising Henry Nowak outrage, while telling people that voting or marching down Whitehall will sort things out.

Injustice as deeply ingrained as this will not be undone by complaining or begging. It can only be eliminated by force. The only question is what sort of force? The moral force brought to bear by the likes of Saunder Lewis in Wales and Gandhi in India, or the physical force unleashed by the Deptford Fire Protest marchers and Black Lives Matter demonstrators.

As civilised people, living in an increasingly divided and tense society, we have to prefer the former and start strictly on that basis. It will be our current masters who decide whether that is enough.

“No Justice, No Peace!”